Skip to main content

Competition Law Litigation: Appeals and Compensation

competition law
Courtroom scene with competition law files

Summary: Suing the Competition Authority to cancel fines and suing cartels for Triple Damages. The judicial review process in Ankara Administrative Courts.

Litigation in Competition Law has two distinct faces:

  1. Administrative Litigation: Suing the Competition Authority (RK) to cancel the massive fines they imposed.
  2. Civil Litigation (Private Enforcement): Suing the Cartel members (companies) to get compensation for the overcharge you paid.

1. Appealing the Authority’s Decision

When the Board imposes a fine (e.g., 50 Million TL), the company has the right to judicial review.

  • Jurisdiction: Exclusively Ankara Administrative Courts. (Because the Authority is in Ankara).
  • Deadline: 60 Days from notification of the Reasoned Decision.
  • Payment: You don’t have to pay the fine to sue. However, if you pay within 30 days, you get a 25% discount.
    • Strategy: Most companies pay (to save 25%) and then sue to get the money back (“Pay and Appeal”).
  • Scope of Review: The court checks if the Authority analyzed the market correctly, if the economic evidence supports the finding, and if the procedure (Defense rights) was respected.
  • Success Rate: Historically low, but rising. Courts are becoming more economically literate.

2. Compensation Lawsuits (Private Enforcement)

This is the “sleeping giant” of Turkish Law (Art. 57-58 of Law 4054). If you are a victim of a cartel (e.g., your suppliers fixed prices and you paid 20% more for cement for 3 years), you can sue them for damages.

The “Treble Damages” Rule (3 Kat Tazminat)

Unlike standard Civil Law where you only get exactly what you lost, Competition Law allows the judge to award 3 times the damage.

  • Why? To deter hidden cartels.
  • Calculation: (Actual Price Paid) - (Hypothetical Competitive Price) = Damage.
    • Result: Damage x 3 = Award.

Who Can Sue?

  • Direct Purchasers: The company that bought cement directly from the cartel.
  • Indirect Purchasers: The home buyer who bought the house built with that expensive cement. (Though proving the “pass-on” is hard).

Burden of Proof

  • Binding Effect: If the Competition Authority has already decided “Company X is a Cartel,” the Civil Court cannot say “No, they are not.” The existence of the violation is proven. The court only calculates the damage amount.
  • This makes “Follow-on Actions” very efficient. You wait for the RK decision, then file your compensation suit.

Conclusion

Competition litigation is high-stakes poker. On one side, companies fight to erase fines that ruin their balance sheets. On the other, victims of price-fixing are starting to realize they can claim massive indemnities.


Contact us for professional legal assistance on this matter.

📞 Call Now: +90 332 351 51 52

📧 Email: info@avukatfevziyaskir.com

📍 Address: Opposite the Courthouse, Karatay/Konya, Turkey

⚖️ Attorney Fevzi Yaşkir - Licensed attorney at Konya Bar Association providing legal consultation and case management services for international clients.

Expert Legal Support

Need professional legal advice regarding Competition Law Litigation: Appeals and Compensation? We are here to protect your rights and manage the process correctly.

Att. Fevzi Yaşkır

Att. Fevzi Yaşkır

Founding Attorney

Fevzi Yaşkır, registered with the Konya Bar Association, practices in Criminal Law, Family Law, Labor Law, and Enforcement Law. He is committed to defending his clients' rights at the highest level.