Objection to Administrative Fines: Competent Court and Procedure

Summary: The Turkish state imposes Administrative Fines (İdari Para Cezası) for thousands of regulatory violations: Traffic rules, noise pollution, customs error...

The Turkish state imposes Administrative Fines (İdari Para Cezası) for thousands of regulatory violations: Traffic rules, noise pollution, customs errors, SGK irregularities, competition violations, and environmental damage. While they are all called “Administrative Fines,” appealing them is legally confusing because jurisdiction is split between Criminal Courts of Peace (Sulh Ceza Hâkimliği) and Administrative Courts (İdare Mahkemesi). Filing in the wrong court leads to rejection and wasted time.

The General Rule vs The Exception

1. General Rule: Administrative Court (İdare Mahkemesi)

According to the Administrative Procedure Law, theoretically, all administrative acts should be reviewed by Administrative Courts.

Examples:
- Competition Authority fines.
- EMRA (EPDK) energy market fines.
- Zoning fines (İmar para cezaları) issued by Municipalities.
- SGK premium fines.
- Customs fines.

2. The Exception: Criminal Court of Peace (Sulh Ceza)

The Law on Misdemeanors (Kabahatler Kanunu) Art. 27 states that if a specific law explicitly assigns the review to judicial courts, then Sulh Ceza is competent. In daily life, the most common fines fall into this exception:

Traffic Fines: Always Sulh Ceza.
Smoking / Noise Disturbance Fines: Sulh Ceza.
Police Identification Fines: Sulh Ceza.
COVID-19 Curfew Fines: Sulh Ceza.

Combined Penalties (Critical Nuance)

There is a vital rule (Kabahatler Kanunu Art. 27/8): If an administrative action includes BOTH a fine (Sulh Ceza jurisdiction) AND an administrative measure (e.g., closing the business, sealing the building, revoking a license - Administrative jurisdiction), then the Administrative Court handles EVERYTHING.

Why? To prevent conflicting decisions on the same event.
Example: If a restaurant is fined for hygiene violations AND closed for 10 days, you file ONE lawsuit in the Administrative Court for both.

Distinct Deadlines

Knowing the deadline is as important as knowing the court.

For Sulh Ceza: 15 days from notification. (Extremely short!).
For Administrative Court: 60 days from notification (usually).

Wait, traffic fines have a generic “discount” period too. If you pay within 1 Month, you get a 25% discount. Putting an objection does not stop this execution. Usually, people pay to get the discount and then object to get a refund.

How to Object?

To Sulh Ceza: Simple petition to the courthouse. No hearing is held usually. Decision is made on the file.
To Administrative Court: Formal annulment lawsuit petition. More complex, requires specific legal arguments.

Conclusion

“I’ll just write a letter to the judge” is not a strategy. Determining the correct court (Sulh Ceza vs Idare) is the first test. If you fail this, your objection is rejected for “lack of jurisdiction” (yargı yolu bakımından görevsizlik), and by the time you fix it, you might have missed the original deadline.

Professional Legal Support

📞 Call Now: +90 554 192 47 20

📧 Email: info@avukatfevziyaskir.com

📍 Address: Opposite the Courthouse, Karatay/Konya, Turkey

⚖️ Attorney Fevzi Yaşkir - Licensed attorney at Konya Bar Association providing legal consultation and case management services for international clients.